<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: a cry for help</title>
	<atom:link href="http://myrobotispregnant.com/2012/04/05/5599/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://myrobotispregnant.com/2012/04/05/5599/</link>
	<description>tough guy poetry and manly stories of loneliness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 19:01:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oggy</title>
		<link>https://myrobotispregnant.com/2012/04/05/5599/comment-page-1/#comment-21194</link>
		<dc:creator>Oggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 00:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myrobotispregnant.com/2012/04/05/5599/#comment-21194</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a real life example I found...

&quot;First of all, it should be noted that one man in 3 ejaculates quicker than he wants to, and that the vast majority of men sometimes ejaculate too quickly. &quot;

one man in 3 ejaculates quicker than HE wants to. The subject is the one man and is singular. 
Two men in three ejaculate at THEIR leisure. plural.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a real life example I found&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;First of all, it should be noted that one man in 3 ejaculates quicker than he wants to, and that the vast majority of men sometimes ejaculate too quickly. &#8221;</p>
<p>one man in 3 ejaculates quicker than HE wants to. The subject is the one man and is singular.<br />
Two men in three ejaculate at THEIR leisure. plural.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oggy</title>
		<link>https://myrobotispregnant.com/2012/04/05/5599/comment-page-1/#comment-21192</link>
		<dc:creator>Oggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 23:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myrobotispregnant.com/2012/04/05/5599/#comment-21192</guid>
		<description>&quot;Americans&quot; refers to the &quot;5 Americans&quot;. One in five Americans....
You can&#039;t say One of every five American...because five is plural. Five Americans. One American. The subject is still the one American who is disabled. It&#039;s qualified as a subset of the five Americans. &quot;in five Americans&quot; is the prepositional clause.
1 in 5 whiskies IS a lot more than a fifth of whiskey. right singular subject.
4 in 5 whiskies ARE a lot more than 1 in 5 whiskies. plural subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Americans&#8221; refers to the &#8220;5 Americans&#8221;. One in five Americans&#8230;.<br />
You can&#8217;t say One of every five American&#8230;because five is plural. Five Americans. One American. The subject is still the one American who is disabled. It&#8217;s qualified as a subset of the five Americans. &#8220;in five Americans&#8221; is the prepositional clause.<br />
1 in 5 whiskies IS a lot more than a fifth of whiskey. right singular subject.<br />
4 in 5 whiskies ARE a lot more than 1 in 5 whiskies. plural subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: homey badger</title>
		<link>https://myrobotispregnant.com/2012/04/05/5599/comment-page-1/#comment-21191</link>
		<dc:creator>homey badger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 21:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myrobotispregnant.com/2012/04/05/5599/#comment-21191</guid>
		<description>Mmmnnn, Whiskey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmmnnn, Whiskey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolston</title>
		<link>https://myrobotispregnant.com/2012/04/05/5599/comment-page-1/#comment-21190</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 06:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myrobotispregnant.com/2012/04/05/5599/#comment-21190</guid>
		<description>But I&#039;m not done.  When they say 1 in 5 Americans, they are saying the subject is a percentage of Americans. Since they put an s on Americans, it&#039;s plural, so &quot;are&quot; is appropriate. 

A fifth of whiskey is not the same as 1/5 fifth of whiskies.  

In the first instance, the fraction is a singular thing. In the second, it is a fraction of many unique things, or individual examples, of one class. 

Which of the following is correct?

1 in 5 whiskies are a lot more whiskies than a fifth of whisky. 

1 in 5 whiskies is a lot more whiskies than a fifth of whiskey. 

Alas, I see my mistake. The right way to say it is neither. 

1 in 5 whiskies is a lot more whiskey than a fifth of whiskey. 

Is that right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I&#8217;m not done.  When they say 1 in 5 Americans, they are saying the subject is a percentage of Americans. Since they put an s on Americans, it&#8217;s plural, so &#8220;are&#8221; is appropriate. </p>
<p>A fifth of whiskey is not the same as 1/5 fifth of whiskies.  </p>
<p>In the first instance, the fraction is a singular thing. In the second, it is a fraction of many unique things, or individual examples, of one class. </p>
<p>Which of the following is correct?</p>
<p>1 in 5 whiskies are a lot more whiskies than a fifth of whisky. </p>
<p>1 in 5 whiskies is a lot more whiskies than a fifth of whiskey. </p>
<p>Alas, I see my mistake. The right way to say it is neither. </p>
<p>1 in 5 whiskies is a lot more whiskey than a fifth of whiskey. </p>
<p>Is that right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolston</title>
		<link>https://myrobotispregnant.com/2012/04/05/5599/comment-page-1/#comment-21189</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 06:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myrobotispregnant.com/2012/04/05/5599/#comment-21189</guid>
		<description>Thanks for putting this into perspective. It was definitely my bionic mind&#039;s fault.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for putting this into perspective. It was definitely my bionic mind&#8217;s fault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oggy</title>
		<link>https://myrobotispregnant.com/2012/04/05/5599/comment-page-1/#comment-21187</link>
		<dc:creator>oggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 05:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myrobotispregnant.com/2012/04/05/5599/#comment-21187</guid>
		<description>62 million Americans ARE disabled. (Subject is countable and is pural)
One fifth (1/5) of Americans are disabled? That&#039;s messy. Still, you are talking about one (1) of five (5) so it&#039;s singular. 
A fifth (1/5) of America is disabled. Even that is a mess because America coud refer to a pastry chef or Playmate or country. 
A fifth (1/5) of America&#039;s population is disabled. (subject is singluar...one...and is countable.)
4/5 of America&#039;s population ARE not disabled. The argument is that the population is countable and is plural.
4/5 of America&#039;s population IS not disabled. The argument here is that the population is not countable so it doesn&#039;t matter if it is plural or not. The fraction of the population is referred to collectively as an uncountable group.

But when referring to one in five you will always have a singular verb.

The problem is that &quot;1 in 5 Americans&quot; equals 62 million. So if you say &quot;1 in 5 Americans&quot; then you are saying 62 million, which is plural. In your bionic mind you are making that mathmatical leap and want the verb to be plural to correspond to the gravity of the problem. 1 disabled person isn&#039;t such a big deal. 62 million disabled people are something else. 

But the way they worded it they have minimized the problem to a single group of five people and one of that group IS disabled. Do that 62 million times and you&#039;ll have your plural verb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>62 million Americans ARE disabled. (Subject is countable and is pural)<br />
One fifth (1/5) of Americans are disabled? That&#8217;s messy. Still, you are talking about one (1) of five (5) so it&#8217;s singular.<br />
A fifth (1/5) of America is disabled. Even that is a mess because America coud refer to a pastry chef or Playmate or country.<br />
A fifth (1/5) of America&#8217;s population is disabled. (subject is singluar&#8230;one&#8230;and is countable.)<br />
4/5 of America&#8217;s population ARE not disabled. The argument is that the population is countable and is plural.<br />
4/5 of America&#8217;s population IS not disabled. The argument here is that the population is not countable so it doesn&#8217;t matter if it is plural or not. The fraction of the population is referred to collectively as an uncountable group.</p>
<p>But when referring to one in five you will always have a singular verb.</p>
<p>The problem is that &#8220;1 in 5 Americans&#8221; equals 62 million. So if you say &#8220;1 in 5 Americans&#8221; then you are saying 62 million, which is plural. In your bionic mind you are making that mathmatical leap and want the verb to be plural to correspond to the gravity of the problem. 1 disabled person isn&#8217;t such a big deal. 62 million disabled people are something else. </p>
<p>But the way they worded it they have minimized the problem to a single group of five people and one of that group IS disabled. Do that 62 million times and you&#8217;ll have your plural verb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyle_S</title>
		<link>https://myrobotispregnant.com/2012/04/05/5599/comment-page-1/#comment-21186</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyle_S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 00:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myrobotispregnant.com/2012/04/05/5599/#comment-21186</guid>
		<description>You right, the fraction is the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You right, the fraction is the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolston</title>
		<link>https://myrobotispregnant.com/2012/04/05/5599/comment-page-1/#comment-21185</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 20:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myrobotispregnant.com/2012/04/05/5599/#comment-21185</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t the subject 1 in 5 Americans?  Can&#039;t the subject be complex?  If you remove that part it reads &quot;1 is disabled&quot; which isn&#039;t the subject of the sentence. 

1 in 5, that is the subject, because its a fraction.  
1/5 of americans are disabled.  Get it?  1/5 of americans is disabled?  No  
But likely I&#039;m wrong. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the subject 1 in 5 Americans?  Can&#8217;t the subject be complex?  If you remove that part it reads &#8220;1 is disabled&#8221; which isn&#8217;t the subject of the sentence. </p>
<p>1 in 5, that is the subject, because its a fraction.<br />
1/5 of americans are disabled.  Get it?  1/5 of americans is disabled?  No<br />
But likely I&#8217;m wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oggy</title>
		<link>https://myrobotispregnant.com/2012/04/05/5599/comment-page-1/#comment-21184</link>
		<dc:creator>Oggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 16:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myrobotispregnant.com/2012/04/05/5599/#comment-21184</guid>
		<description>&quot;One are the loneliest number that could ever be.&quot;
1 out of 2 junk shop owners is in need of a promotional video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;One are the loneliest number that could ever be.&#8221;<br />
1 out of 2 junk shop owners is in need of a promotional video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>https://myrobotispregnant.com/2012/04/05/5599/comment-page-1/#comment-21183</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 13:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myrobotispregnant.com/2012/04/05/5599/#comment-21183</guid>
		<description>The number 1 is the subject so the grammar is correct as written.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The number 1 is the subject so the grammar is correct as written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
